Part I
1. In the late nineteenth century the industrialization era had began. After the Civil War, many women’s role had already changed. Some of them had left their homes and their usual domestic duties and were on their own. Some others, had a family and still worked. Even though women found work in clothing factories, they were still underestimated. They weren’t paid hourly wages. Instead, women’s salary was based on the quantity of their work. Consequently, women started to produce more to earn more. Additionally, women started working in offices. They were good at typewriting. Most of the time, the working class women worked in more than one job, to help their families. Middle class women didn’t have to work. They were either married or from comparatively wealthier families. Elite women didn’t work either. Moreover, they were wealthy enough to have servants who performed their domestic work.
2. The importance of the images is to reflect the dramatic change in Native American women who were sent to boarding schools. In the first picture the girls are dressed like Indigenes. Additionally, they set on the floor. Whereas in the other picture they are around a table, dressed like western women. Most importantly, one of the girls has an open book. This is to show that in these schools they could learn how to read. Most importantly, the images convey an ethnocentric point of view. Native American women were forced to come out of their culture and adapt the western culture, which was considered superior.
Part 2
1. Women from different backgrounds worked at the factory. For one thing, Bessie Van Vorst encounters a woman who has been working their for many years. The physical condition of her eyes reflect years of experience. This woman advices Van Vorst that working at the factory is not going to result in decent life. Next, Van Vorst meets a girl who’s family has the means to support her. Nevertheless, she still chooses to work because this girl wants to spend her own money. Finally, there are others she meets, who had to work because they had to support their families and themselves. Van Vorst sees that every woman in the factory has a personal reason to be there.
2. Bessie Van Vorst concludes that working women are passive in accepting their working conditions because she sees how important they are for their employers and in what conditions they work. These women accept what they are given without realizing their value as a worker. I think Van Vorst is right in saying that women accept whatever conditions of work they are offered. However, I do not agree in that these women are “unwilling to stand up” for their rights. First, all these women have different backgrounds. Some women have financially strong families. Some others need to work to survive. Because their reasons and needs are different, they do not have a common goal. Next, many women don’t want to speak out because they think they may lose their jobs. And for some, losing this job can be crucial. Finally, women, unlike men, are just starting to establish their place in the society, outside of their homes. While they are willing to change their conditions, it is not easy for these women to challenge the new system.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Hi Marianna,
You made some interesting points in your blog. Isn’t it sad to see how great the gap was between working women and elite and middle class women? While the working class spent all day working in factories under harsh conditions and getting paid five dollars a week; rich and middle class women spent their time shopping and enjoying their lives. Not only were working women considered “unskilled” workers, but they were also criticized for working outside the home. In contrast rich and middle class women were seen as being graceful and womanly, and were never criticized for spending their husbands’ money.
I agree with you when you point out that women working in the factories wanted to stand up for themselves, but they were afraid to speak up fearing that they would loose their jobs. There were many women who wanted to work; therefore, if women complained about their positions at work, they would be replaced by other working women. The pay was low and the work was difficult, however, they were forced to work in harsh conditions in order to support themselves or their families, since they were not given any other opportunities to improve their lifestyles. It is sad to see that even though many years have gone by there are people who have the same lifestyle today and are forced to work under harsh conditions in order to make a living.
Mariam R #1
Hi Marianna,
The above comment is from MARIAM res #1
R#1
Tatev
Hi Marianna. When reading your blog I remembered what I read about. What I mean is the stuff you wrote about Bessie is so what I think about her story. I absolutely agree with you about the fact that women might have wanted to stand up for themselves but at the same were accepting their situation. I mean what would happen if they went on strike, then they would probably lose their jobs and not everybody could afford that, some of them really needed the job because they were not working because of pleasure they were working out of need. I also agree with you when you say that there were very different people that she met. Even though they were all from same society and were working in the same factory they had very different views and reasons why they were working in the factory and why were they taking anything that the employers would give them
Gohar R # 2
Hi Mariam, your response to Mariana’s blog # 8 is interesting. You mentioned the big differences between working-class, middle-class and elite women life style. Some of them were working hard all the times and the other one was busy to go shopping. When the working women wanted to stand for their worst condition they got scared because of losing their job. You didn’t mention anything about her discuss about the images and the Van Vorst conclusion. She wrote very well about the images and also she was agreeing with women reaction with Van Vorst.The Van Vorst concludes was for unfairly treat of women and staying quit.
Post a Comment